Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program ; 2022(1): 481-490, 2022 12 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2162277

ABSTRACT

The multifaceted pathophysiologic processes that comprise thrombosis and thromboembolic diseases take on a particular urgency in the hospitalized setting. In this review, we explore 3 cases of thrombosis from the inpatient wards: purpura fulminans, cancer-associated thrombosis with thrombocytopenia, and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the use of dose-escalated anticoagulation therapy and antiplatelet agents. We discuss the evaluation and management of purpura fulminans and the roles of plasma transfusion, protein C and antithrombin replacement, and anticoagulation in treating this disease. We present a framework for evaluating the etiologies of thrombocytopenia in cancer and review 2 strategies for anticoagulation management in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis and thrombocytopenia, including recent prospective data supporting the use of dose-modified anticoagulation based on platelet count. Last, we dissect the major clinical trials of therapeutic- and intermediate-dose anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, reviewing key recommendations from consensus guidelines while highlighting ways in which institutional and patient-tailored practices regarding antithrombotic therapies in COVID-19 may differ. Together, the cases highlight the diverse and dramatic presentations of macro- and microvascular thrombosis as encountered on the inpatient wards.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Thrombocytopenia , Thrombosis , Humans , Blood Component Transfusion/adverse effects , COVID-19/complications , Plasma , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/therapy , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/therapy
2.
An Acad Bras Cienc ; 94(4): e20210202, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2029823

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Role of Convalescent plasma (COPLA) to treat severe COVID-19 is under investigation. We compared efficacy and safety of COPLA with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in severe COVID-19 patients. METHODS: One group received COPLA with standard medical care (n = 14), and another group received random donor FFP, as control with standard medical care (n = 15) in severe COVID-19 disease. RESULTS: The proportion of patients free of ventilation at day seven were 78.5% in COPLA group, and 93.3 % in control group were not significant (p= 0.258). However, improved respiratory rate, O2 saturation, SOFA score, and Ct value were observed in the COPLA group. No serious adverse events were noticed by plasma transfusion in both groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Plasma , Blood Component Transfusion/adverse effects , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Immunization, Passive/adverse effects , COVID-19 Serotherapy
3.
Transfusion ; 62(1): 28-36, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1480228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The reported incidence of adverse reactions following Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) transfusion has generally been lower than expected based on the incidence of transfusion reactions that have been observed in studies of conventional plasma transfusion. This raises the concern for under-reporting of adverse events in studies of CCP that rely on passive surveillance strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our institution implemented a protocol to actively identify possible adverse reactions to CCP transfusion. In addition, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of inpatients who received CCP at Stanford Hospital between May 13, 2020 and January 31, 2021. We determined the incidence of adverse events following CCP transfusion. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients received CCP. Seven patients (14%) had an increased supplemental oxygen requirement within 4 h of transfusion completion, including one patient who was intubated during the transfusion. An additional 11 patients (total of 18, 37%) had increased oxygen requirements within 24 h of transfusion, including 3 patients who were intubated. Six patients (12%) fulfilled criteria for transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO). CONCLUSION: Using an active surveillance strategy, we commonly observed adverse events following the transfusion of CCP to hospitalized patients. It was not possible to definitively determine whether or not these adverse events are related to CCP transfusion. TACO was likely over-diagnosed given overlap with the manifestations of COVID-19. Nevertheless, these results suggest that the potential adverse effects of CCP transfusion may be underestimated by reports from passive surveillance studies.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion/adverse effects , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Immunization, Passive/adverse effects , Oxygen , Plasma , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19 Serotherapy
4.
J Int Med Res ; 49(8): 3000605211032814, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1367644

ABSTRACT

We present a case of transfusion-related acute lung injury as a complication of convalescent plasma transfusion in a patient who presented with COVID-19-related severe acute respiratory syndrome. Despite treatment with tocilizumab, remdesivir, and intravenous steroids, worsening dyspnea prompted adjunctive treatment with convalescent plasma. Two hours after completion of the plasma transfusion, the patient developed hypoxia-induced cardiac arrest secondary to transfusion-related acute lung injury. This case sheds light on life-threatening transfusion reactions and emphasizes the need to investigate post-transfusion monitoring protocols as well as the possible role of surveillance equipment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury , Blood Component Transfusion/adverse effects , COVID-19/therapy , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Plasma , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Serotherapy
5.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 60(4): 103129, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1195468

ABSTRACT

Call back as a procedure to report post donation symptoms or illness by donors has been established since 2009 in Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization (IBTO). During the first phase of COVID-19 outbreak, all blood donors were requested to report any respiratory infection symptoms after donation. The study investigated the callback data of COVID-19 in Tehran Blood Center during the first 3 months of the outbreak in Iran. The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency of post donation COVID-19 related call back reports and determine its implications for blood donors and patients. A telephone interview was conducted with donors who had reported COVID-19 symptoms. Some questions were asked to evaluate donor's health at the time of blood donation. The donors categorized into three groups: laboratory-confirmed, suspected, and COVID-19 irrelevant based on their answers. In cases that the blood component obtained from a laboratory-confirmed donor had been released, the hospital was notified and asked to follow up the recipient for COVID-19. The results showed 30 donors (0.08 %) had callback related to COVID-19 and 76.63 % of the obtained component was disposed. The results also showed that only one donor had a laboratory-confirmed result with the RBC unit processed from her whole blood released for transfusion. The RBC unit recipient did not show any signs or symptoms of infection during a 46-day follow-up. Concluded that callback system was effective to remove most of the components obtained from the donors who reported to be COVID-19 suspected or confirmed. Moreover, the result did not support virus transmission through blood transfusion.


Subject(s)
Blood Donors , Blood Safety , Blood-Borne Infections/prevention & control , COVID-19/prevention & control , Donor Selection , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Transfusion Reaction/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Blood Component Transfusion/adverse effects , Blood Component Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Erythrocyte Transfusion/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Interviews as Topic , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Valve Stenosis/surgery , Symptom Assessment , Young Adult
6.
Transfus Clin Biol ; 28(1): 55-59, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1059459

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the SARS-CoV-2 virus is transmitted mainly through the respiratory tract, possible transmission by transfusion from asymptomatic carriers should be explored. As yet there are no reports of transfusion transmission of COVID-19. Haemovigilance findings within a three-month surveillance period during the new coronavirus pandemic are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Due to great demand and shortage, blood sessions in outpatient facilities were organized during the high prevalence period of COVID-19, alongside a national plan to monitor the evolving public health situation by random molecular screening of high-risk groups of the population. Haemovigilance protocols were implemented as well as surveillance for any COVID-19 case reported post-transfusion. A 14-day quarantine and follow-up molecular and antibody testing of any COVID-19 positive case was obligatory. RESULTS: Post-donation, post-transfusion information and molecular testing of swab samples collected from three asymptomatic donors at risk for COVID-19, revealed the case of an immunosupressed patient who had been transfused with whole blood derived platelets from a donor subsequently diagnosed with COVID-19. The recipient exhibited no symptoms of the disease. Molecular and antibody testing results were negative. CONCLUSION: Haemovigilance provided information supporting the absence of transfusion transmission of COVID-19, thus strengthening the hypothesis that, even if it cannot yet be definitively ruled out, COVID-19 is not transmitted through blood transfusion. As of early June 2020, a perfect test does not exist, therefore haemovigilance along with the implementation of strict proactive measures is crucial to identify eluding asymptomatic individuals and ensure blood safety during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion/adverse effects , Blood Donors , Blood Safety , COVID-19/transmission , Donor Selection/standards , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Viremia/transmission , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Asymptomatic Infections , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Testing , Contact Tracing , Female , Greece/epidemiology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Police , Viremia/blood , Viremia/diagnosis
8.
Mov Disord ; 35(11): 1905-1913, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-635701

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Young plasma infusions have emerged as a potential treatment for neurodegenerative disease, and convalescent plasma therapy has been used safely in the management of viral pandemics. However, the effect of plasma therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of plasma infusions in people with PD. METHODS: A total of 15 people with clinically established PD, at least 1 cognitive complaint, and on stable therapy received 1 unit of young fresh frozen plasma twice a week for 4 weeks. Assessments and adverse effects were performed/reported on and off therapy at baseline, immediately after, and 4 weeks after the infusions ended. Adverse effects were also assessed during infusions. The primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, and feasibility. Exploratory outcomes included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III off medication, neuropsychological battery, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39, inflammatory markers (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6), uric acid, and quantitative kinematics. RESULTS: Adherence rate was 100% with no serious adverse effects. There was evidence of improvement in phonemic fluency (P = 0.002) and in the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 stigma subscore (P = 0.013) that were maintained at the delayed evaluation. Elevated baseline tumor necrosis factor-α levels decreased 4 weeks after the infusions ended. CONCLUSIONS: Young fresh frozen plasma was safe, feasible, and well tolerated in people with PD, without serious adverse effects and with preliminary evidence for improvements in phonemic fluency and stigma. The results of this study warrant further therapeutic investigations in PD and provide safety and feasibility data for plasma therapy in people with PD who may be at higher risk for severe complications of COVID-19. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Transfusion/adverse effects , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Plasma , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aging/blood , Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Biomechanical Phenomena , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cognition Disorders/etiology , Cognition Disorders/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Interleukin-6/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Parkinson Disease/blood , Parkinson Disease/psychology , Risk , Severity of Illness Index , Speech Disorders/etiology , Speech Disorders/therapy , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL